1. The 1950s Jet-Powered Car That Ignored Basic Aerodynamics
In the 1950s, car manufacturers were obsessed with the idea of jet-powered vehicles, convinced that the future of automobiles lay in mimicking aircraft. One of the most infamous examples was the Chrysler Turbine Car, which, despite its futuristic promise, was plagued with fundamental design flaws. Unlike birds, which have evolved streamlined bodies and precise wing control to minimize drag and optimize lift, these cars struggled with basic aerodynamics. The turbine engine produced immense heat and was terribly inefficient for ground use, leading to extreme fuel consumption and overheating issues. According to Mopar Insiders, the car’s turbine engine operated at high RPMs, leading to poor fuel economy and excessive heat generation. Birds, on the other hand, naturally regulate their energy use, gliding with minimal effort and making precise adjustments to their environment.
Perhaps the most glaring issue was how uncontrollable these cars became at high speeds. Nature’s fastest creatures—like the peregrine falcon—can hit speeds over 240 mph but remain completely stable thanks to millions of years of adaptation. Meanwhile, jet-powered cars were death traps, becoming difficult to steer and stop safely. Engineers failed to account for the principles of balance and control that animals have perfected, proving that just because something works in the air doesn’t mean it translates well to the road. Chrysler eventually abandoned the turbine project, and nature remained undefeated.
2. The Ford Pinto: A Car That Ignored the Armadillo’s Defense Strategy
The Ford Pinto is infamous for one of the most catastrophic safety failures in automotive history. Due to a poorly designed fuel tank, the car was prone to exploding in rear-end collisions, turning minor accidents into fatal infernos. According to the Center for Auto Safety, investigations revealed that the design flaws were known to Ford prior to the vehicle’s release, yet they chose not to implement necessary modifications. The irony? Nature has already perfected the art of protecting vulnerable body parts—just look at the armadillo. This armored mammal has a thick, protective shell that absorbs impact, shielding its vital organs from harm. Evolution has taught animals to safeguard their most delicate parts, something the Ford Pinto designers clearly overlooked.
Had engineers taken inspiration from nature, they would have reinforced the rear of the vehicle with better crumple zones or protective plating—similar to how a turtle’s shell distributes force upon impact. Instead, the Pinto’s fuel tank placement and lack of structural support made it one of the most dangerous cars ever produced. The result? Lawsuits, recalls, and a permanent stain on Ford’s reputation. Nature’s designs, once again, proved vastly superior to human oversight.
3. The Brick-Like Hummer H1 That Forgot About Aerodynamics
The Hummer H1, originally designed for military use, was built to be rugged, powerful, and nearly indestructible. However, when it was adapted for civilian use, one glaring flaw became apparent—it was about as aerodynamic as a brick. While nature has perfected the art of streamlining, giving birds, fish, and even insects sleek, efficient body shapes that reduce drag, the Hummer completely ignored these principles. With its flat, blocky design, this vehicle faced massive wind resistance, guzzled fuel at an outrageous rate, and handled like a tank on the road. Animals like the peregrine falcon and cheetah slice through air with minimal resistance, optimizing speed and efficiency. According to Wikipedia, the vehicle featured a high ground clearance and a wide stance, making it ideal for off-road terrain but not for highway driving. The Hummer, on the other hand, struggled against wind drag so much that its fuel economy was laughable, often getting less than 10 miles per gallon.
Additionally, the Hummer’s sheer bulk made it incredibly difficult to maneuver, especially in urban settings. Compare this to the way mountain goats navigate steep cliffs with precision, relying on their perfectly evolved hooves for balance and agility. Nature ensures that even large creatures, like elephants, have efficient ways to move—whether it’s their column-like legs for weight distribution or the way dolphins glide through water using hydrodynamic bodies. The Hummer ignored all of these lessons, prioritizing intimidation over efficiency. As a result, it was clunky, impractical, and eventually phased out in favor of more fuel-efficient SUVs that at least tried to mimic nature’s genius.
4. The 1970s Three-Wheeled Reliant Robin That Defied the stability of Quadrupeds
The Reliant Robin is one of the most comically flawed vehicles in history, largely because it ignored a basic principle of stability that even a toddler understands—three legs (or wheels) are far less stable than four. In nature, most land animals, especially large ones, have evolved with four limbs to provide balance and prevent toppling over. Even creatures with three legs—like certain tripod fish—distribute weight carefully to maintain equilibrium. The Reliant Robin, however, was engineered with just a single front wheel, creating a nightmarish driving experience. Any sharp turn or minor road bump sent the car tipping over, often leaving unsuspecting drivers rolling sideways down the street. As noted by Wikipedia, the car’s lightweight fiberglass body further exacerbated its instability, making it prone to tipping over. It was the opposite of the way four-legged animals move, where the placement of limbs ensures that weight is evenly distributed to prevent tipping.
Even birds, which often stand on two legs, have evolved counterbalancing techniques using their tails and wings to avoid falling over. The Reliant Robin had no such safety net—once it started to tip, there was no saving it. The car became infamous for its inability to stay upright, leading to countless accidents and earning it a permanent place in automotive failure history. Unlike a cheetah, which can pivot at full speed without losing balance thanks to its tail, or even a cockroach that can scurry across uneven terrain without flipping over, the Reliant Robin doomed from the start. Engineers eventually learned that nature’s preference for four-legged (or at least well-balanced) creatures was a better blueprint for stability.
5. The Amphicar That Ignored the Genius of Aquatic Evolution
In the 1960s, engineers attempted to merge cars and boats into a single vehicle, giving birth to the Amphicar, a car that could supposedly drive on land and navigate water. It was an ambitious idea, but it failed miserably because the designers overlooked the evolutionary brilliance of aquatic animals. Fish, turtles, and even semi-aquatic creatures like beavers have evolved over millions of years to move seamlessly between land and water, according to Classic Driver. The Amphicar, on the other hand, was slow, leaky, and neither a good car nor a good boat. It floated awkwardly, struggled against currents, and moved through water at an embarrassingly slow pace of about 7 mph.
One of the biggest problems was propulsion—while fish use streamlined fins and tails to glide efficiently, the Amphicar relied on tiny, inefficient propellers that barely moved it forward. A beaver can transition from land to water effortlessly because its webbed feet and waterproof fur are specifically adapted for both environments, but the Amphicar suffered from rust, leaks, and poor maneuverability. Rather than embracing nature’s fluidity, engineers forced a clunky hybrid that was doomed to fail. Eventually, the Amphicar faded into obscurity, proving that evolution’s water-to-land transition is far more effective than any human-designed amphibious vehicle.
6. The DeLorean’s Gull-Wing Doors That Trapped People Like a Venus Flytrap
The DeLorean DMC-12, made famous by Back to the Future, was undeniably stylish, but it suffered from a major safety flaw—its futuristic gull-wing doors were a death trap in certain conditions. Nature has perfected the art of enclosure and exit strategies, whether it’s a bird’s ability to take off instantly or a snake’s ability to strike and retreat in a fraction of a second. The DeLorean, however, ignored these principles and created a design that was highly impractical in real-world emergencies. The gull-wing doors required extra space to open, meaning if a driver was ever trapped in a tight parking spot or overturned vehicle, they had no way out. This problem was made worse by the fact that the car’s electrical system, which controlled the locks, often failed—essentially trapping drivers inside.
Compare this to nature’s most efficient escape artists—like the octopus, which can squeeze through impossibly small openings, or even a cat, which instinctively finds multiple exit strategies from any enclosed space. Nature has ensured that creatures can escape when necessary, whether it’s through flight, squeezing, or sheer speed. The DeLorean, in contrast, forced its drivers into a potentially life-threatening situation if they found themselves upside down or in a tight space. While it remains an iconic movie car, the gull-wing door design proved to be a fundamental safety fail, highlighting once again that nature’s evolutionary problem-solving is far superior to human engineering experiments.
Click here for more stories like this
7. The Chevy Corvair That Ignored the Genius of the Gecko’s Grip
The Chevrolet Corvair, produced in the 1960s, became infamous for one major flaw—it had terrible handling and an unstable rear-engine design that made it prone to losing control. The car’s suspension system was so poorly designed that it often led to dangerous oversteering, making it easy for drivers to spin out, even at moderate speeds. Unlike nature’s most adept climbers—such as the gecko, which can cling to walls with microscopic hairs on its feet—the Corvair had no reliable way to maintain grip. Instead of engineering a car that responded to road conditions as smoothly as a mountain goat navigating rocky cliffs, Chevy created a vehicle that felt more like an unpredictable roller coaster ride.
One of the biggest failures of the Corvair was its lack of stability adjustments. In nature, even the fastest animals—like the cheetah—have built-in stabilizers, such as their long tails, to help them make sharp turns without losing balance. Birds of prey adjust their wing angles mid-flight to counteract wind resistance. But the Corvair lacked the suspension technology necessary to compensate for its rear-engine weight distribution, meaning that once it started losing control, there was little drivers could do. The car was eventually targeted in Ralph Nader’s groundbreaking book Unsafe at Any Speed, which exposed its deadly design flaws and led to safety reforms in the auto industry. In the end, nature’s designs—rooted in millions of years of evolution—once again proved superior to human miscalculations.
8. The Smart Fortwo That Forgot How Armadillos Survive Impact
The Smart Fortwo was marketed as a revolutionary compact car that could squeeze into tight spaces and navigate crowded urban streets with ease. But while its small size was a selling point, it also became one of its biggest flaws. The car’s ultra-lightweight design meant that in a high-speed crash, it offered far less protection than larger vehicles. Unlike the armadillo, which has evolved a flexible but sturdy shell that absorbs impact and protects vital organs, the Smart Fortwo’s tiny frame often crumpled in severe accidents.
Armadillos survive by curling up, distributing force evenly across their armor, and absorbing shocks in a way that minimizes internal damage. The Smart Fortwo, on the other hand, relied on a reinforced safety cage, but that didn’t change the fact that it was simply too small to compete against larger vehicles on the road. In crash tests, it often fared worse than mid-sized sedans and SUVs because the laws of physics were not on its side. While nature teaches us that compact creatures can still be tough—like the honey badger, which is small but nearly indestructible—engineers failed to apply these lessons in a way that truly protected drivers in real-world collisions.
9. The Explosive Tesla Model S Batteries That Ignored Nature’s Cooling Systems
Electric cars are hailed as the future of transportation, but early designs, including the Tesla Model S, suffered from a major oversight: overheating lithium-ion batteries that could spontaneously burst into flames. While nature has perfected cooling mechanisms in animals—from elephants flapping their ears to regulate body temperature to desert lizards that change color to reflect heat—Tesla engineers struggled to control the massive energy stored within their battery packs. In some cases, collisions cause battery cells to overheat, triggering chain reactions that result in intense fires. Unlike gasoline fires, which can often be extinguished quickly, lithium-ion fires burn hotter and longer, sometimes reigniting even after being put out.
Compare this to how nature’s most heat-exposed creatures handle extreme temperatures. Camels, for example, store fat in their humps, which allows them to regulate heat without overheating their bodies. Crocodiles bask in the sun but cool off by opening their mouths or submerging in water. Tesla’s engineers eventually improved cooling systems and battery placement, but the early fire incidents served as a stark reminder that harnessing energy requires a level of heat management that nature has already mastered. If engineers had looked to biology for inspiration, they might have developed a more effective way to dissipate heat rather than relying on reactive safety measures after incidents occurred.
10. The Pontiac Aztek’s Design Disaster That Ignored Evolutionary Aesthetics
The Pontiac Aztek is often cited as one of the ugliest cars ever made, and while aesthetics might seem like a superficial concern, there’s a reason why nature prioritizes good design—form often follows function. In the animal kingdom, creatures evolve appearances that not only serve practical purposes but also create balance and harmony. Predators like wolves have sleek, muscular bodies that optimize speed and power, while peacocks use their extravagant feathers to attract mates. The Aztek, however, threw all design principles out the window, resulting in a bulky, awkward vehicle that looked neither strong nor stylish.
Beyond its hideous appearance, the Aztek’s mismatched proportions also affected its functionality. It was top heavy, making it less stable on the road, and its wide, sloping back made cargo storage inconvenient. Nature shows us time and time again that good design is about efficiency—whether it’s the aerodynamic perfection of a falcon’s wings or the streamlined body of a shark that minimizes drag in the water. Pontiac, on the other hand, ignored these principles, creating a vehicle that was as impractical as it was unsightly. It quickly became a commercial failure, proving that even in engineering, aesthetics and function must go hand in hand—just like they do in nature.
11. The Brick-Sized Side Mirrors That Ignored the Owl’s Silent Flight
For years, car manufacturers designed side mirrors without considering aerodynamics, resulting in bulky, wind-resistant structures that created unnecessary drag and noise. Nature, on the other hand, has already perfected silent movement—just look at owls. These nocturnal hunters have uniquely fringed feathers that break up turbulence, allowing them to fly soundlessly through the night. If engineers had studied Owls more closely, they would have realized that smoother, more streamlined mirror designs could reduce wind resistance and cabin noise significantly.
Instead, many cars were equipped with oversized, blocky side mirrors that whistled loudly at high speeds and disrupted airflow. This increased drag, reducing fuel efficiency and making highway driving noisier than it needed to be. Eventually, some manufacturers introduced sleeker, more aerodynamically refined mirrors, but it took decades to make these adjustments. Owls have been gliding silently for millions of years, while humans took far too long to apply the same logic to something as simple as side mirror design.
12. The Tesla Yoke Steering Wheel That Ignored the Genius of Hooves and Paws
Tesla’s controversial yoke steering wheel, introduced in some models of the Model S and Model X, was meant to feel futuristic, but it ignored one fundamental truth about control—grip matters. In nature, animals have evolved paws, hooves, and claws that provide maximum contact and precision. Cats retract their claws for stealth but extend them when they need traction. Horses’ hooves allow them to gallop at high speeds while maintaining full stability. The Tesla yoke, however, took away the comfort and practicality of a circular steering wheel, making simple maneuvers—like U-turns and parking—far more difficult.
Many drivers found the yoke impractical, complaining that it was harder to use in real-world driving conditions, especially at low speeds. While some race cars use yokes, they’re designed for high-speed, controlled environments—very different from everyday city driving. Nature teaches us that the best tools for movement are those that maximize contact and adaptability, whether it’s the way geckos grip surfaces or how birds adjust their talons to perch. Tesla eventually offered a return to traditional steering wheels, proving once again that nature’s solutions are often the best ones.
